复制粘贴吧 关注:217,784贴子:1,782,866
  • 1回复贴,共1

世界是荒诞的 人生是痛苦的 生活是无意义的

只看楼主收藏回复

荒谬
荒谬(法语:absurde;英语:absurdism),又译荒谬主义,哲学术语,字源是拉丁文的absurdus,意为音乐上的“不合调”,在存在主义中用来形容生命无意义、矛盾的、失序的状态。
概述
一个事物的基本意义的存在必须要一个更高的意体来解释。但是,这个更高意体的意义又必须要一个比它更高的意体来解释。这个“解释的锁链”不可能达到一个结果,从而,没有任何东西可以拥有至高的意义。哪怕这个结果被发现了,它也有可能并不能满足我们。好比说,当一头猪发现它的“至高意义”是被人当成食物屠宰掉时,它不会对这个“意义”感到满足的。从而,根据存在主义和虚无主义,生命是无意义的,是荒诞的。
哲学家的描述
法国存在主义哲学家加缪在《西西弗斯的神话》(西西弗斯)对荒谬做的描述:在一个突然被剥夺掉幻象与光亮的宇宙里,人觉得自己是一个外人、一个异乡人,既然他被剥夺了对失去家园的记忆或对已承诺之乐土的希望,他的放逐是不可挽回了。这种人与生命以及演员与场景的分离就是荒谬的情感。
解决办法
●面对荒诞的生命,某些人认为紫啥是一个看似理智的方案;但是大部分人试图寻找其他的办法。加缪提出自杀并不是一个很好的方案:如果生命真是荒诞的话, 那唯一面对它的方法只有维持一个人对待荒诞的自我反应; 所以,如果没有良心的话, 这个思想与荒诞的相互反应是无法存在的。 请参考《西西弗斯的神话》和《反抗的人》(英语:The Rebel (book))。
●某些人透过神或宗教找到了意义。
●某些人试图透过哲学找到意义。
●“拒绝意义”, 并定义“生命的意义”为“活着本身”是另一种解答的方法。
●很多人接受生命是无意义的, 但并不认为这是一个问题。 同上,哪怕至高意义存在,他有可能并不能满足我们。相反,他们透过自己的生命去创造意义。 虽然这个意义并不是至高的,但它能给人动力。


IP属地:山东来自Android客户端1楼2023-01-10 00:05回复
    If you found this note in a small wooden box with a heart on it, then *congratulations!* You are probably the first person to read this. I didn’t really plan on sharing this with anybody, but for some reason I think it’s exciting that somebody out there, a complete stranger, will come across this note and read my story. Someone I will never meet, sharing such a personal bond with me. I’m fascinated that either one of us could die - even as soon as tomorrow - with the other being completely clueless to the fact. To you, my entire life is within this note, and so I will live for as long as your memory can carry me. Writing this, I’m wondering if that makes you feel fascinated or violated. It’s so exciting.
    I’m sorry if my story is a bit disorganized, but I’d like to get it down while it’s still fresh on my mind. First, I’ll tell you a little bit about myself. I’m a first-year college girl and have led, by most standards, a pretty unspectacular life up to this point. I grew up in an upper-middle class school district with decent teachers. I did track in middle school and some of high school, and I’ve had two boyfriends. Now, I’m studying for a career in occupational therapy, because I feel the field is undervalued and provides tremendous help to people.
    I’m giving you this background because there’s this strange misconception that if you want to kill someone then you’re either sick in the head or you have anger management issues. But, it’s very apparent that I don’t fall into either of those categories. It’s true that most murder cases are in a domestic setting where someone loses control of their anger or something. But the thing is that those people kill under provocation, whether by a singular outburst or by a slow-burning series of misfortunes. Those people kill because in that brief moment, they want a specific someone, for a specific reason, to be hurt or killed.
    What I’m talking about is wanting to kill someone for no specific reason, maybe just to see what i


    IP属地:广东来自Android客户端2楼2023-01-10 05:58
    回复